
The White House in Washington is a Georgian style building. Georgian architects employed a decorative style derived from ancient Greece and Rome. Which explains the white painted surface, because it was generally assumed that the ancient Greek and Roman buildings were white. After all, when looking at pictures of the archetypical example of classical architecture, the Parthenon in Athens, it always looks white.

Only recently I visited the Parthenon for the first time. And probably similar to most architects in this world, I had always assumed that it is white.
Well....
It isn't.
The color of the Parthenon is more like ochre, which is not white by a long shot. I suppose most of the pictures of the Parthenon are shot so that they more or less represent our cliche image of it, instead of representing the actual situation. But as the saying goes: every picture is a lie. If indeed the design of the White House was derived from classical architecture, its color is simply plain wrong. But there's more to it.....
In fact the Parthenon, and all other major classical buildings, were originally painted in bright colors. I will delve deeper into this subject in future posts, but just trust me on this for the time being. This also means that the colors of neo-classical buildings such as the White House are based on a misconception. In fact it would probably be more historically accurate, not to mention more fun, to repaint the White House in pink. ;-)


Comments (6)
The equivalent to the White House in Argentina is called the "Casa Rosada", which translated means "Pink House"
See http://gosouthamerica.about.com/cs/argentina/l/blpixBACasaRosa.htm
Posted by Awake | August 29, 2007 6:40 PM
Posted on August 29, 2007 18:40
Hi Awake,
Well, what do you know....
That's quite a funny coincedence...
Posted by Igor | August 29, 2007 10:31 PM
Posted on August 29, 2007 22:31
Interesting post. Of course, the White House was not originally painted white (or even called "The White House"). When you go on a tour of Washington they explain to you how the British tried to burn it down in the war of 1812 and to cover the burnt charring of the original bare stone they painted it white - a tradition which has continued to this day. So it may originally have looked far more like the Parthenon ruins than it does today.
Posted by Adam | August 30, 2007 4:29 AM
Posted on August 30, 2007 04:29
Hi Adam,
I didn't know that. Interesting...
But the point is that white has always been kind of a default color in neo-classic (or renaissance-classic) architecture. You just need to take a look at the works of Palladio....
Posted by Igor | August 30, 2007 1:49 PM
Posted on August 30, 2007 13:49
I always thought the way the Parthenon was photographed was down to overexposure, due to the very bright midsummer Mediterrannean light. Bleached on film, so that's become the way people expect to see it.
I remember it being a sandstone colour, not ochre, which may be the same effect.
Love this blog, btw.
Posted by brendadada | September 7, 2007 11:51 PM
Posted on September 7, 2007 23:51
I started thinking where did Paris get the idea.
Posted by PinkPanther | August 6, 2008 3:25 AM
Posted on August 6, 2008 03:25